How Distant Voting in Congress Has Change into a Helpful Perk


WASHINGTON – When the House of Representatives revised its rules in the early days of the pandemic to allow lawmakers to vote remotely, South Carolina Rep. Ralph Norman was among 161 Republicans who sued for blocking the agreement, arguing that it “undermines” the constitution.

But those objections were a distant memory in late June, when Mr. Norman and several other Republicans skipped town during a legislative work week to rally with Donald J. Trump on the southwest border. While satisfied with the former president, lawmakers issued official letterhead certifying that they were “unable to physically attend negotiations in the House of Representatives” because of the coronavirus, and nominated colleagues in Washington to replace them with proxies submit.

The rule might have attracted more attention if it hadn’t been so widespread since the House passed rules last spring that for the first time allow Members to vote without being in the Chamber. Once billed as a temporary crisis measure to keep Congress going and protect lawmakers as a deadly pandemic across the country, the proxy system has become an instrument of personal and political convenience for many members of the House of Representatives.

Fourteen months after approval, with the public health threat on the retreat and most members of Congress vaccinated, a growing number of lawmakers are taking advantage of the practice to attend political events, double their jobs at home, or just take a long drive to Avoid Washington.

Perhaps no one has benefited more from the deal than spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, who recently informed lawmakers that proxy voting would be in place for the remainder of the summer. It has made it possible for Mrs Pelosi, whose majority is so small that she can afford to lose no more than four Democrats if every member is present and voting, to all but ensure that absences alone do not cost her vital support .

The simple legislators have also made full use of the advantages. The day before the border crossing, MP Ron Kind, a politically vulnerable Democrat from Wisconsin, used the proxy to instead accompany President Biden on a visit to his home state.

In February, a dozen Republicans, including Matt Gaetz of Florida and Devin Nunes of California, were criticized for doing the same to attend the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Florida – after many of them angered the Democrats for their use of proxy . At around the same time, several Democrats were using voting proxies to participate in protests in Minneapolis surrounding the Derek Chauvin murder trial.

And data suggests lawmakers regularly use the system to extend their home weekends. According to external experts who have compiled and analyzed data on proxy voting in the House of Representatives, use is often carried out on days when lawmakers are supposed to fly in and out of the city. The house returns on Monday after a two-week hiatus; On the last day of the meeting before the break began, 39 members used their proxies instead of appearing in person to vote.

“People who use it lie,” said Wisconsin Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher, criticizing both parties’ leaders for doing little to counter police violations. Congress itself, he claimed, was paying the price.

“It indulges the worst impulses of the modern Congressman,” added Gallagher, “that is, spending all of your time flying around the country raising money and avoiding all the nuts and bolts of legislative work.”

Many legislators, including some who are exposed to serious health risks, are applying the rules as intended to protect themselves from contracting the coronavirus or to make work easier due to the additional stresses of travel and family care during the Difficult or impossible travel would be a pandemic.

Democratic leaders say a full return to normal operations is simply not yet possible while the country remains in a state of emergency and many Americans are unvaccinated, and their aides point out that the risk of breakthrough infections remains.

But with the current rules to be re-approved in August, senior Democrats are among those pushing for a wider debate – both about when to end existing emergency powers and whether a narrow-minded institution like the House of Representatives is sticking to others should orient American institutions and use the pandemic as an impetus for more sustainable change.

“We did this because we had no choice,” said Jim McGovern, Rep., Democrat of Massachusetts and chairman of the rules committee. “The question now is, are we going to get rid of everything or do we keep some of it? I don’t know what the answer will be in the end, but I think this is when we have this conversation. “

Rep. Steny H. Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland and majority leader, has emerged as the most influential proponent of introducing a more bespoke electronic system that would allow lawmakers to become ill from pregnancy, serious illness, or even a natural disaster in their districts, then vote remotely, the pandemic ends.

While insisting that this is not their motivation, leaders like Mr Hoyer and Ms Pelosi have benefited from the Emergency Authority, which has ensured that all 220 Democrats can cast their vote regardless of where they are – an effective tool in trying to to force one of the closest majorities in decades. Ms. Pelosi, who was initially reluctant to switch to remote work, did not say whether she would support making the practice permanent in any way.

Nearly three out of four Democrats in the House of Representatives have voted remotely at least once, according to analysis by CNN, and six Democrats have not voted in person since January, including some with serious health risks. Republican use was less common, but dozens of party members also voted by proxy.

Rep. Katie Porter, a Democrat from California, said she hoped that shared experiences could help fuel a broader reflection on what types of work should and should not be done in person. Ms. Porter, who represents part of Orange County, said she saved nearly 20 hours of travel time in a few weeks by choosing to work in her county instead.

“We have to debate on the floor, we have to see each other’s faces,” said Ms. Porter. “But post offices? Tell me how I explain to my constituents the taxpayer benefit of flying to Washington and staying away from my community to vote on a post office. “

But California MP Kevin McCarthy, the minority leader, and other leading Republicans have taken a tough line against this practice. They claim that the ease of working remotely is slowly changing the character of an institution that has been based on physical gathering for more than two centuries. They have vowed to abolish proxy voting immediately if they regain a majority in 2022.

“Congress is like a small town – you miss the whole relationship,” said Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole, the top Republican on the rulers, calling the changes “the first step on a very slippery slope.”

Members who fail to show up in person are likely to miss the back room conversations, face-to-face debates, and the arm turns that Congress is aiming at.

“As a whip, it’s much harder to whip someone, to convince them when they’re in a different place, distant and not part of the give and take,” said Mr. Cole, one of his party’s designated nasal counters, who himself through one Deputy elected.

For now, Republican leaders have given their own members, like Norman, a pass to use proxy, admitting that they will look the other way while the house rules say so. A spokesman for Mr Norman declined to comment.

But Mr McCarthy’s stance is likely to make it more difficult to reach the bipartisan consensus that would almost certainly be required to bring about really lasting change. Republicans’ lawsuit to reject proxy voting as unconstitutional is still slowly weaving its way through the courts

Pressed on the concerns of the opposition, Mr McGovern, chairman of the Rules Committee, insisted that the dysfunction plaguing the House of Representatives had less to do with remote-controlled legislation than with the ideas that Republicans have advocated, including their efforts to minimize or justify the Capitol uprising.

“What I’m worried about right now is that we have people who keep denying or downplaying what happened on January 6th or circling the crazy lies surrounding the election,” McGovern said. “That destroys Congress – not the ability for a small group of people to vote remotely or by proxy.”